01/03/2012 10:47 | By Ed Holden, editor, MSN Movies

The Iron Lady: movie review

The astonishingly accurate Meryl Streep performance has been evident since the first trailer. But how has The Iron Lady handled the divisive former Prime Minister?


The Iron Lady (© Pathe)

Release date: 6 January 2012
Director: Phyllida Lloyd
Starring: Meryl Streep, Jim Broadbent, Alexandra Roach

What's it about? An elderly Margaret Thatcher is struggling to come to term with the loss of her husband Denis five years earlier. As she learns to let go, her memories of Denis cause her to relive the pivotal moments of her extraordinary life.

What did we think? Those seeking to have their views of Thatcher either bolstered or offended will be disappointed. Instead, it dives into the tired mind of an elderly woman, often beautifully, telling a far more personal story. It's politically light. But it stands alone as a well-crafted film built on an outstanding Streep performance.

"Unwillingness to move from a position," reads the ghost of Denis Thatcher (played by Jim Broadbent) from a crossword puzzle at one point in The Iron Lady. "Obstinate," replies Meryl Streep's elderly 'MT'. "I knew you'd get it," replies the apparition of her deceased husband. It's about as close to having a dig at Margaret Thatcher as The Iron Lady gets. In fact, we don't really get into politics at all. Instead, we focus on an elderly Alzheimer's sufferer coming to terms with the loss of her husband.


The performances of Streep and Broadbent are as masterful as expected. They are a joy to watch together. And the dynamic, in which Denis' 'ghost' triggers a series of flashbacks, cleverly allows us to study the character without questioning her actions in any substantial way.

When we do go back to the Thatcher premiership, The Iron Lady looks at her remarkably favourably. We often see her strike a gallant pose and deliver her somewhat imperial lines as a rousing orchestral score builds in the background and a union jack flutters somewhere in the shot.

An error occurred while trying to display the data. Please try again later.

Will you go and see The Iron Lady?

Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results

  1. 77 %
    Yes
    607 votes
  2.  
    23 %
    No
    179 votes

Total Responses: 786
Not scientifically valid. Results are updated every minute.

It's all heavily simplified and made accessible to an international audience. Essentially we get a look at her famously bullish approach to the 80s recession and the strikes. Then The Falklands happens - she's equally strong-minded - and the good times roll after that. You'd be forgiven for not quite remembering it that way.

Whatever your outlook on Thatcher, you can't deny that there was and is enormous strength in the former PM's character. And that strength is absolutely the centre of this remarkable Meryl Streep performance. 'Powerhouse', to use the hackish term, doesn't nearly say it all.

For all that strength, however, she's portrayed as dependent on Denis. He repeats the line "steady the buffs" to her at several key moments, including her departure from number 10, where Streep does a tremendous job of Thatcher's famous tear. He's also there towards the end of her premiership, where the iron grip is seen to slip and her famed lack of sleep appears to affect her.

Allow us to make space for Alexandra Roach, who is outstanding in the role of the young Margaret Roberts, who first campaigns. With a reptilian Richard E Grant as Michael Heseltine, an impressive Harry Lloyd as young Dennis and Olivia Colman doing an effortless job of Carol Thatcher, it's a supporting cast that more than holds its own in the shadow of Streep. Roach stands out: a real find.

4 stars

Gets behind the iron but never questions it. The Streep performance will come to be seen as a true great, lifting the whole thing.


Trailer: The Iron Lady

January movies preview: The best movies of the month

62Comments
avatar

Any film that sings the praises of this person is in my opinion not worth seeing.  You don't need a long memory to remember the evil that was thatcher's legacy.

Shame on the film industry

12/01/2012 21:02
avatar
everybody forgets the poll tax which every one in house payed  and she  took the milk away from the kids wake up  better off without yous.Devil 
09/01/2012 12:48
avatar

james

             thatcher didnt sell off our industries. workers are wet behind the ears , and caused the sell off. wake up mate and smell the rosies and have a strong latte. then have a look around ,other than the bankers  the countrys got f.... all . private companys and shareholders own the country now . and what a better place it is? maybe for you it is ?

07/01/2012 23:12
avatar
An excellant film. Hard hitting and very true to history. Meryl Streep should easily get an Oscar for her performance.
06/01/2012 21:25
avatar
I'd like to see this film actually, I've seen and read views from both sides of the "love maggie/hate maggie" spectrum, I worked until recently in a factory that employed disabled people, it was closed to save a cash strapped council, I agree that it had to happen, from that I totally understand her choice to shut down all the dwindling industries draining the country, labour seem to destroy everything, ESPECIALLY the education system! and we need someone who can and will cut everything which is **** and not fair but its necessary unfortunately, I know she pissed everyone off and I get that but she had to do it I guess, I don't get this thing where the poor apparently get poorer and the rich get richer?? don't believe that, there are more working class people than there are rich folk so cutting their income wont even touch the deficit the country is suffering and therefore working class people are actually helping more than they realise and I accept this wholly, i am struggling to get back into full time work but I believe (with fingers crossed) than everything going on will be worth it and eventually we'll ALL get back on our feet again, WITH the help of hated "tyrants" like maggie.    
avatar
Steve Moron: You are well named. Not only do you appear to be totally ignorant of the facts but you seem intent on venting your hate in a rather impotent fashion. We all know that the North East is struggling and has been for some time now - since the closure of the shipyards and the steel industries. What led to these closures? Come on son, be honest. If you are not still wet behind the ears you must remember strike after strike where the yards were hardly open three months in a year. What business can absorb that  kind of behavior. If the workers had had the bottle they would have told their Union Leaders where to get off...but they did not...and lost their industries.
The reason this sheep-like behaviour existed is down the the tactics employed by these Marxist infiltrators into our industries. They knew if a worker was isolated, intimated, threatened, that they would toe the line. They used the law and rules to their benefit...to way governments about. Give them their due they knew the rule books inside out and were clever at manipulation truth. The middle management in Britain at this time were bewildered by it all and could not cope as they had enough a job to do without having to combat political destroyers in their midst. 'Lines of demarcation' was a favorite in shipyards; if a chippy drilled through some wood and accidentally hit metal - Strike. He had breached his union rule - he was not allowed to drill metal - seems silly now, but this closed Camelairds for six months. Don't tell me that Thatcher closed down industries because this is definitely NOT true; they were dying as a result of the actions of Trade Union Leaders and the apathy of the working man not understanding what Union Leaders were doing to their jobs. Ignorance is no excuse the working man needs to think for himself. Now we are better educated it is more easily understood. I believe you should get yourself off to night-school and get an education before you sound off you hate messages without justification.

avatar
Reading some of the comments blogged here I wonder whether some of you are delusional or just ignorant and simple. The hate shown against Thatcher is something that puzzles me greatly as those that blog in this fashion surely have no grasp of politics or of the true conditions that prevailed at the time she rose to power. Had the Labour government been looking after the country in a proper manner she would never have attained the position of PM in the first place. Labour turned Britain into the laughing stock of Europe; we were being mocked by the Australians and the Americans and France was cocking a snoot at us also - kicking us when we were down - due to Labour mishandling our economy again. We had to go cap-in-hand to the IMF for loans to stay afloat as we were all but bankrupt. Our industries were being crippled by the Unions - well not actually the Union members but their leaders, all of whom were practicing philosophies foreign to our land. People like Red Ken, Derek Hatton, and his ilk: destroyers basically that killed off the motor, shipbuilding and steel industries.  The Scottish car industry, Camelairds at Mersyside, and Tyne Tees all suffered as a direct result of  their actions against Britain.  It took a lot for the working man to realise that politics affected them also and that politics was not merely an emotive subject  conjurerd up by the popular press. The eighties and ninetys brought  prosperity to Britain and only one person was responsible for that; Margaret Thatcher. Now once again, for the third time in 100 years Labour have taken us to the brink. I do not know what it is about them but they singularly fail to manage finance. Had the Gold reserves not been 'given' away and had the banks been monitored correctly we might be in a better position today.

Who is in power hardly matters, it is what they do when they are there that counts. It's a poor choice really...Labour can't manage money and the Conservatives don't understand social problems...As for the Liberals...well decision making was never their strong point; bless.

Well I trust that I have succeeded in upsetting as many people as possible with political bents, so now to the teachers - If you had the intelligence to teach practical history as a subject in the classroom we might, just might, have a future generation that can understand politics and the repercussions of actions taken. Cause and effect is important in understanding where we are today and the clues are there to help avoid repeat performances. Mr. McCorber was RIGHT. Look him up in Dickens.

avatar
That should cheer the economy up for those who can afford to laugh without being taxed for it; one way to start the day, with have a nice day, without being penalised for it.Smile
avatar
Never will be for me neither, in my gap years during the 70's exploring different countries, i was asked to make a film, they said i looked a lot like her and had to wear a wig, i would not perform a sodomy, so i was rejected from the world of show business, i'm not ashamed for my honesty, i won't make love to animals nor children either.
06/01/2012 03:25
avatar
Not for me and never will be. How out of touch are these film makers?
avatar
My Father was a farmer growing fruit and i now have to work hard at 60 y.o.a in whatever decent way i can not to be a fertiliser on a chicken farm.
avatar
Anyway, Hitler promised us all a VW and i need one because my shoes have worn out.
avatar
I really would not want the same moustache as that, i would rather stand at the bar and order a half.Mobile phone.    Talking in telephone numbers, fairweather friends.    Get to know your business and then walk straight past you in the street without so much as a thumbs up.
avatar
Can't stand either of them, punctilious bossy boots, domineering continuously, should soften up and keep quiet.
05/01/2012 11:34
avatar

i wouldnt waste my money on watching it. i lived in britain during the first 3 years of her reign and got out . in fact she helped me. there was not a lot of work about! returning briefly in the late eighties/early nineties, what a shock !  you couldnt imagine the destruction that she caused to working people and the country

i saw the old mare on tv tonight, looking splendid in her red frock at her doorstep, still gives me the creeps to think that her mindset and policys are still alive and well in britain today

avatar

Your turn David to show true grit like

Maggie, get us out of the EU, ASAP! 

05/01/2012 10:41
avatar
Having lived through the eighties with Thatcher as pm, I definitely would not want to watch this film's depiction of that time and call it entertainment.  I want something more magical for entertainment. 
05/01/2012 10:08
avatar

M Thatcher never had the power of Hitler.  She never had the guillotine in UK for dissident British.  The punishment for ridiculous supposed crimes in Germany l94l etc. such as playing an american jazz record. 

 

As for the film, why 80% would want to watch this is beyond my imagination.  More than boring for me. 

04/01/2012 13:54
avatar
cant imagine anyone who can remember what life was like under this tyrant.
for make no mistake she was a vicious tyrant who hated men and anyone less well  off than herself .
at least her cabinet finally showed some backbone and got rid she did nothing for women in politics a woman pm will proberly  never be put in downing street ever again thanks to her
22/12/2011 14:47
avatar
@ Rob Loxley
 

No it wasn't. Britain hasn't been in the black for over 100 years.

 

In 1979 UK national debt was already falling (as it had been doing consistently under both Labour and Tory governments since the end of WW2). After 1979 it initally continued to fall under the Tories, but then began to rise until in 1997 it was only slightly less than it was in 1979!

 

Your view of Thatcher seems somewhat at odds with the facts (a trait I often notice in Tories).

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Scroll upScroll down

latest movie videos

msn movies poll

In 50 years of Bond movies, who has been the best 007?

Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results

  1.  
    45 %
    Sean Connery
    2,540 votes
  2.  
    1 %
    George Lazenby
    70 votes
  3.  
    11 %
    Roger Moore
    645 votes
  4.  
    3 %
    Timothy Dalton
    162 votes
  5.  
    19 %
    Pearce Brosnan
    1,058 votes
  6.  
    21 %
    Daniel Craig
    1,158 votes

Total Responses: 5,633
Not scientifically valid. Results are updated every minute.